When an obscure online publication reported that bandits had overrun a Nigerian Army base in Obanla, Kwara State, seizing six General Purpose Machine Guns (GPMGs) and over 30,000 rounds of ammunition, panic rippled across parts of the North-Central region. The headline spread rapidly on social media, stoking fear and outrage. Within hours, screenshots of the alleged “attack” went viral, with some users interpreting it as yet another sign of Nigeria’s fragile security architecture crumbling under the weight of armed non-state actors.
But when investigators and military correspondents began to dig deeper, the narrative began to fall apart. The Nigerian Army, through its 2 Division Headquarters in Ibadan, swiftly released a detailed statement on October 5, 2025, signed by Lieutenant Colonel Polycarp Okoye, Deputy Director of Army Public Relations, describing the report as “false, misleading, and deliberately mischievous.” The army insisted that no such incident took place, and that not a single weapon or position was lost to any group of bandits.
The Viral Claim
The false report, published late on October 3, alleged that bandits in large numbers had ambushed troops of the 148 Battalion (Rear) at a remote post near Obanla, overpowering them after hours of gunfire. The article claimed that several soldiers were killed, while others fled into nearby forests, leaving behind weapons and ammunition. To make the story more believable, the report cited “anonymous local sources” and “security insiders” who supposedly witnessed the attack. The story quickly found traction among social media users who shared it across X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, and WhatsApp, often accompanied by alarming captions warning of “rising insecurity in Kwara.”
However, the problem with such claims, according to security analysts, is not just that they are false—it is that they are dangerously timed. In an era where misinformation can erode public confidence in national institutions, false reports about military operations have real consequences. “When people read that the Army is losing its bases and weapons, they start to panic,” said a senior defense analyst in Abuja who asked not to be named. “It emboldens criminals, discourages investors, and weakens public morale.”
The Nigerian Army’s Rebuttal
Within hours of the false publication, the Nigerian Army issued a strongly worded response. In the statement released by Lieutenant Colonel Okoye, the Army described the report as a “fabrication designed to mislead the public and undermine the morale of gallant troops diligently working to restore peace and stability in the region.” The rebuttal went on to clarify that troops of the 148 Battalion (Rear), which operates under the 2 Division, had in fact recorded significant operational successes in recent days.
According to the official record, the battalion had conducted several clearance operations across Kogi and Kwara States as part of ongoing efforts to flush out criminal elements, including kidnappers and armed bandits who have used the border areas between the two states as hideouts. One of these operations, carried out along the Kwara–Ekiti border axis, led to the neutralization of two armed bandits and the recovery of two brand new AK-47 rifles. The troops reportedly mounted a “strong blocking position” to intercept the movement of armed elements fleeing from previous engagements.
The Army’s statement emphasized that at no point was any of its positions overrun or any cache of weapons and ammunition lost, as claimed by the online platform. “The entire story is not only false but also a deliberate attempt to discredit the military and sow seeds of doubt among citizens,” the Army declared.
The Setting: Why Kwara and Kogi Matter
To understand why this false report gained so much attention, one must look at the geography of insecurity in North-Central Nigeria. Kwara and Kogi occupy a strategic position on the country’s security map. Both states share borders with Niger, Ekiti, Ondo, and the Federal Capital Territory. In recent years, the dense forests along these borders have become transit corridors for armed groups moving between the North-West and the South-West.
Communities such as Obanla, Oke-Onigbin, and parts of the Patigi axis have occasionally reported strange movements, sporadic attacks, and abductions, often blamed on migrating bandit groups displaced from Zamfara and Niger States by military offensives. For this reason, the Nigerian Army’s 2 Division intensified clearance operations in the area, deploying troops from the 148 Battalion (Rear) to conduct what military insiders describe as “aggressive cordon and search” missions.
“The operation has been ongoing for several weeks,” said a senior officer who requested anonymity. “We’ve dismantled several hideouts and arrested informants who provided logistics to bandits. So it is not surprising that some groups or their sponsors might want to spread false stories to create confusion or discourage our troops.”
The Anatomy of a Fake News Campaign
Further investigation by media analysts revealed that the false story originated from an online news blog notorious for sensational security headlines. The site has a history of publishing unverified claims about military operations and attributing them to “unnamed intelligence sources.” In this case, the story was picked up by smaller blogs and quickly shared on social media before fact-checkers could verify it.
Digital forensic experts traced the first post to a Twitter account with less than 500 followers, which tagged popular handles to amplify the post. Within two hours, the tweet had been retweeted over 3,000 times, with various influencers adding their own commentary. Some political accounts even seized the opportunity to attack the government, accusing the military of incompetence.
“What we are seeing is an emerging pattern of coordinated misinformation targeting the armed forces,” said Dr. Ijeoma Eke, a media ethics researcher at the University of Ilorin. “Fake news about security incidents can destabilize regions, provoke fear, and even incite local resistance to legitimate military presence.”
The Army’s Broader Counter-Misinformation Efforts
This is not the first time the Nigerian Army has had to respond to misinformation regarding its operations. Over the past year, several fabricated reports have circulated, ranging from claims of desertions to false allegations of arms theft. To combat this, the Army’s Department of Civil-Military Affairs and its Directorate of Army Public Relations have intensified their efforts to engage the public directly.
Through regular press briefings, on-ground media tours, and verified social media accounts, the Army now publishes real-time updates about ongoing operations. The approach has helped reduce the influence of rumor mills but has not completely eliminated the problem. “Misinformation is evolving,” Lieutenant Colonel Okoye noted during a follow-up phone interview with journalists. “But so are our strategies. We encourage Nigerians to rely on official communication channels and avoid spreading unverified claims.”
The Real Story on the Ground
In contrast to the false claims of defeat, field reports from the 148 Battalion paint a picture of quiet but steady success. The battalion has been part of Operation Whirl Stroke II, an inter-agency security initiative targeting cross-border criminal networks in Kogi, Kwara, Niger, and parts of the Federal Capital Territory.
In the past two months alone, troops have destroyed several makeshift camps used by kidnappers, rescued hostages, and recovered a range of weapons including pump-action guns, rifles, and explosives. Local vigilante groups have been working alongside the Army, providing intelligence about movements of suspicious individuals along key routes like Omu Aran, Kabba Junction, and Egbe.
A community leader in Omu Aran who spoke on condition of anonymity confirmed that the troops have increased their patrols in the area. “We now sleep better,” he said. “Before, these criminals were using our bushes as passageways. But since the Army started these operations, it has been quiet.”
Why False Reports Hurt Morale
For many serving soldiers, the spread of false reports about supposed defeats hits hard. Soldiers stationed in isolated regions often depend on public morale for psychological reinforcement. When news spreads that their positions have been overrun—even falsely—it affects families, community trust, and overall operational focus. “My mother called me crying after she saw that story,” said a soldier attached to the Kwara–Ekiti axis who spoke anonymously. “She thought something had happened to me. It’s not fair.”
The Nigerian Army leadership acknowledges this human factor. That is why, in addition to combat operations, it has strengthened welfare and communication lines between deployed troops and their families. The new welfare hotline allows family members to verify information directly from divisional headquarters instead of relying on social media.
The Larger Implication
The Army’s firm denial of the Obanla “attack” also reflects a larger struggle in Nigeria’s information space—one that goes beyond military operations. As digital access expands, more Nigerians rely on social media for news. However, with little regulation and poor media literacy, false reports spread faster than official clarifications. This dynamic often gives misinformation an initial advantage, even when later disproved.
The Army’s latest response is therefore not just a rebuttal—it is a test of institutional credibility. In many ways, the speed and confidence with which it addressed the report send a strong message to both domestic and foreign observers: the Nigerian military is not as vulnerable as rumor mongers suggest.
Sustaining the Operational Momentum
Despite distractions, the Nigerian Army says it remains focused on its mission to secure the North-Central corridor. The 2 Division has vowed to sustain the tempo of operations until all criminal networks in Kwara, Kogi, and adjoining states are dismantled. This commitment aligns with the broader national security strategy that aims to combine kinetic operations (direct combat) with non-kinetic measures such as community engagement, intelligence sharing, and rehabilitation of repentant insurgents.
“Security is not just about shooting guns,” said a senior military intelligence officer. “It’s about building trust. Once the communities know the soldiers are here for them, criminals lose ground—both literally and psychologically.”
The Final Word
At its core, the controversy surrounding the alleged “overrunning” of troops in Kwara is not just about truth versus falsehood—it’s about perception, control, and credibility in an age of instant information. The Nigerian Army’s swift response helped avert widespread panic and reasserted confidence in its ongoing counter-banditry operations. But it also served as a reminder that in modern warfare, information is as critical a weapon as any gun or missile.
In the end, the Army’s message was clear: the so-called “Obanla attack” never happened. No guns were lost. No base was overrun. Instead, what really happened was the neutralization of two bandits and the recovery of rifles—tangible results of an ongoing operation that continues to make quiet progress where it matters most: on the ground.
The Nigerian Army’s warning to the public could not be more direct—“disregard false reports, trust verified information, and support the military with timely intelligence.” In an era where disinformation travels faster than truth, that reminder might be the most important defense of all.
Post a Comment