In what has quickly evolved into one of the most politically explosive investigations since the return of democracy in 1999, multiple sources within the Nigerian security establishment have confirmed that a former governor from the southern region is now under close surveillance for alleged links to the recently foiled coup plot against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration.
The unfolding saga, which began with the detention of 16 senior military officers, including a Brigadier-General and a Colonel attached to the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), has now spilled beyond the barracks into the murky world of civilian power, money, and politics.
According to multiple sources who spoke to Daily Trust and other national outlets, the former governor—whose name is being withheld pending the outcome of the preliminary investigation—is suspected to have provided both financial and logistical support to the alleged plotters. His alleged role, security insiders say, may have involved facilitating discreet communication channels and possible funding for coordination meetings held in Abuja and two southern states.
Though no official charges have been filed, intelligence officials say the links were “strong enough to trigger a parallel line of inquiry” into the civilian dimensions of what the Defence Headquarters has so far described as an internal disciplinary matter.
A Quiet Operation Turns into a Political Storm
The early October arrests were initially downplayed by the Defence Headquarters (DHQ), which announced that the officers were being held for “indiscipline and breach of service regulations.” At first, this seemed routine—until multiple online investigative platforms, including Sahara Reporters and Premium Times, independently reported that the detentions were tied to an alleged plot to overthrow the government.
Their sources claimed the plan was meant to unfold on October 25, coinciding with a period when President Tinubu was scheduled to return from international engagements.
A military source quoted by Premium Times said that the conspirators had allegedly coordinated with informants inside the Presidential Villa and among senior political aides. The same source suggested that the motive was rooted in “widespread discontent within the officer corps over promotions, political favoritism, and perceived corruption at the top echelons of power.”
The revelation triggered an immediate wave of anxiety within the presidency. Security officials quietly advised against holding the traditional Independence Day parade on October 1—a decision that many now believe was linked to the intelligence warnings about possible instability within the ranks.
A Former Governor Under the Microscope
According to new information gathered by Daily Trust, one of the key civilian figures now under scrutiny is a former governor with deep roots in the oil and gas industry. Security sources believe his vast financial networks and lingering political grievances made him an ideal financier for what one insider described as “a desperate and ill-fated adventure.”
“Yes, that is true,” said one senior intelligence officer familiar with the investigation. “There are civilian accomplices, including a former governor, but the extent of their involvement is still being investigated. For now, there are 16 officers in custody, but that number could rise.”
Investigators are reportedly focusing on the former governor’s recent interactions with some of the detained officers, including bank transfers, private meetings, and communications that coincided with known movements of the conspirators.
If any direct financial link is confirmed, the former governor could be invited for questioning. “No one is above scrutiny at this stage,” the source added.
Inside the Intelligence Investigation
The probe is said to be coordinated by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) with participation from all three arms of the military. It is being chaired by a Major-General and includes senior officers from the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
A senior defence official told reporters that the identities of the officers under investigation are “highly guarded,” but disclosed that the Brigadier-General implicated hails from Niger State, while a Colonel being investigated is from Nasarawa State. The latter officer’s family, deeply connected in political and traditional circles, has already confirmed his detention.
“The Colonel from Nasarawa is from a very influential family,” the source explained. “His father is a traditional ruler and brother to former Governor Umaru Tanko Al-Makura.”
In Lafia, the Nasarawa capital, anxiety and disbelief have gripped the community. “He is my uncle,” a family member told Daily Trust, visibly shaken. “The entire family is in distress. The wife of the officer is inconsolable. Our prayer is that they are not found guilty of the allegations.”
Political Shockwaves Across the Country
What makes this episode particularly unsettling is its political undertone. Analysts note that Nigeria’s military, though largely professionalized since 1999, remains sensitive to internal frustrations and external manipulations.
The mere hint of civilian involvement—especially by a former governor—has reopened fears of elite-driven conspiracies aimed at destabilizing the democratic order when political or economic ambitions are threatened.
Sources close to the Presidency say President Tinubu has received multiple briefings from the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), who reportedly flew to Lagos earlier this month to present a “preliminary report and a draft of the official press release” before it was made public.
“The Attorney General advised caution,” another source said. “The language of the initial draft was considered too alarming. It was softened to avoid panic among citizens, investors, and the diplomatic community.”
DHQ’s Damage Control and Public Denials
In a statement dated October 4, the Defence Headquarters described the detentions as “a routine disciplinary measure,” denying that there was any link between the arrests and an attempted coup.
Later, following intense speculation online, the DHQ issued another statement titled “DHQ Never Mentioned Any Coup Attempt.” The release, signed by Brigadier-General Tukur Gusau, dismissed the media reports as “false, malicious, and intended to cause unnecessary tension.”
According to the military’s explanation, the cancellation of the Independence Day celebrations was due to President Tinubu’s “strategic bilateral engagements abroad” and the need for the Armed Forces to “sustain the momentum in the fight against terrorism, insurgency, and banditry.”
“The Armed Forces of Nigeria remains fully loyal to the Constitution and the Commander-in-Chief,” the statement read. “Democracy is forever.”
However, several observers found the denial unconvincing. “When the military says 16 officers were arrested for ‘breach of service regulations’ but refuses to disclose their offences or identities, that raises questions,” said a retired military intelligence analyst, Colonel Emmanuel Ajayi (rtd). “You don’t deploy that level of secrecy for routine disciplinary cases.”
The Timeline of a Crisis
The investigation reportedly began in late September when signals from internal counterintelligence networks hinted at unusual communications among a group of mid-level and senior officers. These communications allegedly included discussions about “reclaiming national dignity” and “ending corrupt leadership.”
By the time the plot was uncovered, some of the conspirators were said to have held several clandestine meetings in Abuja and Port Harcourt. Surveillance teams reportedly intercepted encrypted messages suggesting that October 25 was the date of “operational commencement.”
Before the arrests, security around key federal institutions was quietly reinforced. The decision to cancel the Independence Day parade, sources say, was made after the arrest of a few principal actors who allegedly confessed during preliminary interrogation that “civilian sponsors” were providing financial backing.
The Shadow of the Former Governor
While authorities have yet to name the former governor, speculation has swirled across political circles. Several analysts have noted that the description—“a southern ex-governor with a background in oil and gas and extensive political networks”—narrows the field considerably.
Security officials maintain that his involvement remains “under investigation” and that no invitation has been extended yet. “It’s a matter of evidence,” one senior defence source noted. “If clear proof emerges of financial or logistical support, the former governor will be called in for interrogation.”
The investigation also extends to several other politicians described as “influential figures from both the north and south.” Their bank transactions and travel histories are currently being reviewed.
Public Reactions and Calls for Transparency
Since the story broke, Nigerians have taken to social media demanding clarity. Many are calling on the military to release the names of the detained officers and to explain, in detail, the nature of their alleged crimes.
On Facebook, one user, Adelabi Gbenga, wrote: “Dear military, kindly avail Nigerians specific offences these people committed. There is no smoke without fire.”
Another, Edidiong Jackson, posted on X (formerly Twitter): “Breach of service regulations? Tell us the exact breach. Don’t keep us in the dark. After all, it’s our taxes that pay you.”
Others speculated about political motivations behind the arrests, suggesting that the crackdown might also be a pre-emptive move against dissent within the military amid growing economic hardship and public discontent.
A Fragile Democracy and the Ghost of the Past
For many Nigerians, the mere mention of a coup plot revives the trauma of the nation’s history of military interventions. Between 1966 and 1999, Nigeria experienced multiple coups and counter-coups that claimed lives, disrupted governance, and crippled institutions.
While democracy has endured for more than two decades, lingering distrust between the military and the civilian class remains. Some analysts see the current episode as a reminder that democratic consolidation requires not only elections but also equity, discipline, and morale within the Armed Forces.
“The military’s loyalty is often tested not in peace, but in frustration,” said Dr. Amina Ibrahim, a political historian at the University of Lagos. “When officers feel marginalized, underpaid, or exploited for political ends, the risk of internal dissent rises. Add political financiers with money and grievances, and you have a dangerous mix.”
What Lies Ahead
As the Defence Intelligence Agency continues its probe, several scenarios are being quietly discussed among Nigeria’s security and political elites. One involves a quiet prosecution of the officers through military tribunals, with minimal public disclosure. Another, should civilian involvement be proven, could trigger a high-profile trial that drags influential political figures into the spotlight.
For now, the government is walking a tightrope—balancing the need for transparency with the fear of destabilizing an already fragile economy and security landscape.
Whether or not the alleged coup was real, exaggerated, or politically manipulated, the episode has exposed cracks in Nigeria’s democratic fabric—cracks that money, propaganda, and power have long tried to paper over.
In the words of a senior retired officer:
“This isn’t just about a coup that failed. It’s about the sickness in our system—ambition without ideology, wealth without accountability, and power without conscience. Until that changes, Nigeria will continue to live under the shadow of its own fears.”
Post a Comment